FANDOM


By prof. L. Kaliambos (Λευτέρης Καλιαμπός) Τ. Ε. Institute of Larissa Greece ( March 2014 )

LefterisKaliambosbiography2 html m430410ce

 

AFTER THE DISCOVERY OF THE ELECTRON SPIN (1925)  FOR FINDING  THE COVALENT BONDS IN MOLECULES THE INVALID RELATIVITY LED TO THE QUALITATIVE APPROACHES LIKE THE SO-CALLED SYMMETRY PROPERTIES

Despite the enormous success of the Bohr model (1913) and the Schrodinger equation (1926) based on the well-established electromagnetic laws in explaining the principal features of the spectrum of one-electron atomic systems, neither was able to provide a satisfactory explanation of the  chemical properties of atoms for forming molecules, because the discovery of the electron spin gives a peripheral velocity greater than the speed of light. Therefore under the influence of the invalid relativity physicists developed theories of the so-called qualitative symmetric properties including not the real magnetic attractions between the two electrons  of opposite spin . In fact, velocities greater than the speed of light give magnetic attractions of short range which overcome the electric repulsions of long range at short inter-electron separations.

 It is well-known that in 1925 Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck discovered the electron spin

S = [s(s+1)]0.5 (h/2π)   where s  = 1/2

which gives a peripheral velocity u greater than the speed of light (u >> c ) invalidating Einstein’s relativity. In fact, I discovered that the velocity (u >>c ) cannot be related with the absorption of photons in the PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT OF LAWS . Such a velocity (u >> c )  gives stronger magnetic attraction than the electric repulsion at an inter-electron separation r  <  578.8/1015 m.  So in the absence of such a detailed knowledge, great theoretical physicists, under the strong influence of the invalid relativity, abandoned the natural laws of electromagnetism and developed theories with qualitative approaches.  Following the  work, of Pauli (1925) who suggested the qualitative exclusion principle for two electrons of opposite spin, chemists studied the chemical properties of numerous compounds. Though their efforts shed much light on the subject, the fundamental nature of the forces that hold atoms together to form the simplest hydrogen molecule remained mysterious. For example about 1927 great scientists like Heitler, London, Born, Oppenheimer, and later, Pauling, and others, under the abandonment of natural laws of electromagnetism applied without success the new techniques of the quantum mechanics to the problem. Under such a crisis a new Molecular Orbital Theory was developed in the years after the qualitative valence bond (1927) primarily through the efforts of Hund and Muliken.   In the Molecular Orbital Theory, atoms form bonds by sharing electrons. That is, in the absence of a real attractive force  atomic orbitals combine theoretically to form molecular orbitals.

Similar to atomic orbitals, molecular orbitals were assumed to be wave functions giving the probability of finding an electron in certain regions of a molecule. Each molecular orbital can only have 2 electrons, each with an opposite spin. The hydrogen molecule for example was assumed to have two molecular orbitals, an antibonding orbital and a bonding orbital. However the theory cannot explain how  the atomic orbitals overlap, to give an increase in electron density and therefore an increase in the intensity of the negative charge. In fact an attractive magnetic force contributes to the increase in negative charge which causes the nuclei to be drawn closer together. Due to the lower potential energy in molecular bonds than in separate atomic orbitals, it is more energy efficient for the electrons to stay in a molecular bond rather than be pushed back into the 1s orbitals of separate atoms. This is what keeps bonds from breaking apart. However in the absence of such a detailed knowledge today the Molecular Orbital  Theory is applied in a manner using sum empirically derived parameters.       

LefterisKaliambosbiography2 html 251b5f4b

NCSR "Demokritos" (2002)


In other words Einstein’s CONTRADICTING RELATIVITY THEORIES did much to retard not only the progress of nuclear physics but also the progress of atomic and molecular physics. Under this physics crisis I published my papers “ Nuclear structure is governed by the fundamental laws of electromagnetism” (2003) and  “Spin-spin interactions of electrons and also of nucleons create atomic molecular and nuclear structures”.(2008). In that papers I showed the DISCOVERY OF NUCLEAR FORCE AND STRUCTURE and the DISCOVERY OF TWO ELECTRON ATOMS .

 

DISCOVERY OF THE BINDING ENERGY OF THE SIMPLE HYDROGEN MOLECULE

Here the two electrons of opposite spin (S = 0) behave like one particle circulating about the two separated nuclei with opposite spin  under the rules of quantum mechanics. In this bonding state we neglect the very small magnetic attraction between the two spinning protons of opposite spin. If the protons are well separated the system of two electrons with S =0 will be bound to one or the other. The ground state energy in eV in each proton is then given by

E  = -27.2 Z2 + 16.95 Z -4.1  eV.  Since Z=1 one gets  E  = -14.35  eV  

As the proton-proton separation is reduced, the wave function is altered since the system of two electrons of opposite spin feels the electrostatic potential of both protons. For example in the case of the Helium atom we apply the above equation for Z = 2 and get E = - 79  eV 

However in the case of the hydrogen molecule the detailed experiments showed that the separation of the two protons is ro = 0.74/1010 m which yield  a positive potential Epp in eV given by

Epp = Ke/ro  = 14.4/0.74 =  19.46 eV

In this case the system of two electrons of opposite spin feels not the electrostatic potential of the charge Ze = 2e but the potential of the effective charge ζe where 1 <  ζ <  2. Thus we write

E = -27.2 ζ2 +16.95 ζ  - 4.1 + 19.46  eV

Since the detailed calculations of the experiments yield  E = -31.68 eV we may write

27.2 ζ2  -16.95ζ - 47.04 = 0.  Then solving for ζ one gets ζ = 1.663.

 

CONCLUSIONS

The successful discovery of the electron spin which gives a peripheral velocity greater than the speed of light under the influence of the invalid relativity led to the abandonment of the well-established laws of electromagnetism. Note that the well-established laws of Coulomb and Newton were applied for the enormous success of the Bohr model and the Schrodinger equation. (See my BOHR AND SCHRODINGER REJECT EINSTEIN and NEWTON INVALIDATES EINSTEIN ). In fact. the peripheral velocity (u >> c) of spinning electrons gives a magnetic attraction of short range between the two electrons of opposite spin which overcomes the electric repulsion of long range at a short inter-electron separation. So the two electrons behave like one particle circulating about the two nuclei under the rules of quantum mechanics. However  this situation of two coupling electrons leads to the vibration energy Ev = 16.95 ζ – 4.1. Also the two separated protons yield a positive energy of 19.46 eV . Nevertheless the total energy of -31.68 eV for ζ = 1.663  is  stronger than the energy of  -14.35 eV for Z = 1. Therefore compared to the original atomic orbitals, the bonding molecular orbital has lower energy and is therefore more stable.